Growth response of European sea bass under different starvation cycles and feeding rates

Screen Shot 2015-04-02 at 12.19.09 AM

The compensatory growth response of the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) faced cycling starvation and restricted ration was assessed. Juveniles (10.5 g) were stocked into 15 tanks at a density of 25 fish per tank. Five different feeding regimes were tested on triplicate groups of fish: CSatiation: control fed for 60 days without deprivation, CRestricted: 25% restricted feeding, S-R: 1 day starvation then 4 days CRestricted feeding, R-F: 1 day CRestricted feeding then 4 days CSatiation feeding, and, finally, S-F: 1 day starvation then 4 days CSatiation feeding. The specific growth rate of fish in the CSatiation (2.5±0.06 %/day), S-F (2.5±0.11 %/day) and R-F (2.4±0.18 %/day) were significantly higher than that of CRestricted (2.2±0.05 %/day) or S-R (2.0±0.01 %/day). Fish in S-F group was able to achieve catching up with the CSatiation. There was no significant difference in feed conversion rates but R-F and S-F consumed ~34% more feed than CSatiation following the first re-feeding day. While the highest lipid content was observed in CSatiation (14.4 %), S-R (33.3 % dry matter) had the highest water content compare to the CSatiation and CRestricted (37.8 and 36.9 % dry matter, respectively). In conclusion, it may be concluded that sea bass has rapid response to cycling starvation/re-feeding and that a 25% restricted feeding ratio is insufficient to invoke a compensatory growth response in sea bass.

Link to article: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.02970.x/abstract

Thermal tolerance of European sea bass

Screen Shot 2015-04-02 at 12.09.23 AMThis study was carried out to determine upper (CTMax) and lower (CTMin) thermal tolerance, acclimation response ratio (ARR) and thermal tolerance polygon of the European sea bass inhabiting the Iskenderun Bay, the most southeasterly part of the Mediterranean Sea, at three acclimation temperatures (15, 20, 25 °C). Acclimation temperature significantly affected the CTMin and CTMax values of the fish. At 0.3 °C/min cooling or heating rate, CTMin ranged from 4.10 to 6.77 °C and CTMax ranged from 33.23 to 35.95 °C in three acclimation temperatures from 15 to 25 °C. Thermal tolerance polygon for the juveniles at the tested acclimation temperatures was calculated to be 296.14 °C. In general, the current data show that our sea bass population possesses acclimation response ratio (ARR) values (0.25–0.27) similar to some tropical species. The cold tolerance values attained for this species ranged from 4.10 to 6.77 °C, suggesting that cold winter temperatures may not pose danger during the culture of European sea bass in deep ponds or high water exchange rate systems. Upper thermal tolerance is more of a problem in the southern part of the Mediterranean as maximum water temperature in ponds may sometimes exceed 33–34 °C, during which underground cool-water should be used to lower ambient water temperature in the mid-summer. For successful culture of sea bass in ponds, temperature should be maintained around 25 °C throughout the year and this can be managed under greenhousing systems using underground well-waters, commonly available in the region.